📊 Annual Industry Report · 2024

The State of Research Peptide Quality. 2024.

An independent dataset from 20000 research peptide samples submitted to Apollo Analytical during Jan 2023 – Dec 2023 — across 142 distinct suppliers. Free to share, cite, and republish with attribution.

Published Jun 2024 · CC BY 4.0 · Cite as: Apollo Analytical, State of Research Peptide Quality 2024.
20000
Samples Analyzed
142
Distinct Suppliers
58%
Overall Pass Rate
22%
Under-fill Defects

Pass rate by peptide class

Percent of samples meeting all release specifications (identity, purity, content, residuals). n shown per class.

GLP-1 analogs (Sema / Tirz)55% · n=4900
Growth hormone secretagogues60% · n=4050
Healing & repair peptides (BPC-157, TB-500)51% · n=3450
Melanocortin agonists (MT-2, PT-141)47% · n=2050
Nootropic / cognitive peptides59% · n=1550
Custom-synthesized (one-offs)72% · n=4000
Key Findings

Four conclusions from the 2023 dataset.

01

Less than 6 in 10 vials passed all release specs.

Across 20,000 independently submitted samples, 42% failed identity, purity, content, or microbial specifications — a baseline we've tracked improving in subsequent years.

02

Purity was the dominant failure mode.

HPLC gap from labeled spec was the most common single defect in 2023, driven heavily by GHRH analogs and longer sequences with truncation impurities.

03

GLP-1 quality was alarmingly inconsistent.

Semaglutide and Tirzepatide samples passed at only 55%. Identity failures (deamidation, wrong sequence) drove most rejections.

04

Brand reputation was a poor predictor.

High-profile vendors failed at similar rates to boutique suppliers. Reference-standard-backed identity testing was the only reliable filter.

Defect Breakdown

How peptides actually fail.

A failing sample frequently fails more than one specification. Percentages below are share of all 20000 samples submitted, not share of failing samples.

Failure mode% of samples
HPLC purity below stated spec (>2% gap)
19%
Under-fill of stated mass (>10% short)
22%
Identity mismatch by ESI-MS
16%
Excess residual TFA (>1%)
9%
Endotoxin above injectable threshold
6%
Water content out of spec (Karl Fischer)
4%

Cite this report.

Released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Republish, embed, or quote with a link back to this page.

Apollo Analytical (2024). The State of Research Peptide Quality 2024. Phoenix, AZ.
Retrieved from https://apolloanalytical.com/peptide-quality-report-2024